WhoCites
WhoCites vs AI SEO dashboards and visibility platforms
WhoCites is a one-time AI citation proof check for teams that need to know whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Grok, and Google AI Overviews mention, cite, and recommend their brand. Moz Pro, Search Atlas, Temso, Profound, Otterly.AI, Peec AI, and Goodie are useful comparison points when a buyer is deciding between one-off proof and ongoing monitoring.
Run an AI visibility scanComparison overview
WhoCites is built around one paid report, one included post-fix re-scan, and copy-ready repair tasks. Moz Pro, Search Atlas, Temso, Profound, Otterly.AI, Peec AI, and Goodie are commonly discussed as broader AI visibility, AI SEO, or GEO monitoring options.
- WhoCites: best for one-time diagnosis, launch checks, and builder-ready fixes.
- Moz Pro: commonly evaluated when a team wants AI visibility inside an established SEO suite.
- Search Atlas: commonly evaluated for broader AI SEO and marketing automation workflows.
- Temso: commonly evaluated for ongoing AI search monitoring and agent-assisted execution.
- Profound: commonly evaluated for enterprise AI visibility and answer-engine monitoring.
- Otterly.AI: commonly evaluated for ongoing AI search monitoring and brand visibility workflows.
- Peec AI: commonly evaluated for GEO monitoring and competitor visibility tracking.
- Goodie: commonly evaluated for broader AI search visibility and optimization workflows.
When WhoCites is the better fit
WhoCites is the better fit when the buyer wants a single scan, a plain-English diagnosis, no subscription, and a report they can paste back into Replit, Claude, Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, v0, or a developer workflow.
When another platform may be better
A recurring AI visibility platform may be better when a team needs always-on monitoring, team dashboards, multi-market reporting, agency workflows, or deep enterprise analytics.
Which should you choose?
Start with WhoCites if you are trying to prove the problem and fix a public site. Move to an ongoing platform if AI search visibility becomes a recurring operating metric across many prompts, teams, brands, or markets.
How can I track brand mentions in ChatGPT?
WhoCites tracks brand mentions in ChatGPT by running controlled buying-intent prompts and reporting whether your brand appears, ranks, gets cited, or gets replaced by competitors. Start with one public domain scan, then use the fix prompts to improve the pages AI systems can read.
Which tools monitor AI search visibility?
WhoCites monitors AI search visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Copilot, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews in one paid scan. Teams that need ongoing enterprise dashboards may also compare Moz Pro, Search Atlas, Temso, Profound, Otterly.AI, Peec AI, Goodie, Semrush, and Ahrefs.
How do I measure share of voice in AI answers?
WhoCites measures share of voice by comparing your brand mentions against competitor mentions across the scan's AI responses. The report shows which brands dominate the answer set and where your site is missing.
Can I track mentions across ChatGPT and Gemini?
WhoCites can track whether your brand appears across ChatGPT and Gemini as part of the same seven-source scan. It also checks Claude, Grok, Copilot, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews so the result is not tied to one model.
What is the best AI search visibility tracker?
WhoCites is the best fit when you need a one-time AI search visibility tracker with plain-English fixes instead of a recurring monitoring platform. If you need continuous enterprise reporting, compare subscription tools like Moz Pro, Search Atlas, Temso, Profound, Otterly.AI, Peec AI, or Goodie.